Blog

Customizing Your MSSP Partnership: Balance Flexibility and Control

Written by SecureOps Team | Sep 2, 2025 3:06:04 PM

For CISOs, the goal of cyber resilience—the ability to prepare for, withstand, and rapidly recover from a cyberattack—means shifting how you engage with Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs). It's no longer about buying a static service. It requires building a collaborative partnership. 

In recent articles, we provided context across the ideas shared by security leaders in a series of conversations we had with them. Taking their ideas collectively, we found that achieving a mutually-beneficial partnership requires a delicate and essential balance with flexibility on the part of the MSSP and control on the part of the CISO.

This dynamic relationship moves beyond a simple transactional exchange to a true collaboration. Without a partner's flexibility, the service is rigid and results in a false sense of security. Without the CISO in control, your organization risks security gaps, operational chaos, and a loss of strategic direction.

Below, we explore how the two dynamics work together to create a partnership customized to your specific environment, team, business and industry context, and cyber resilience roadmap. And we look at what could go wrong if the balance is off.

The Power of Flexibility: Adapting to Your World

An MSSP's flexibility is the engine of a resilient partnership. It's based on the vendor's willingness to adapt their service to your unique environment, not the other way around.

Done well, flexibility is a strategic imperative. This can include:

Commercial and Contractual Flexibility

The ability to adjust services delivered as the business grows or as internal teams mature. Offering a wide range of services in flexible bundles, such as a retainer you can use for different services, shows a commitment to the client's success. Environments shift, along with business objectives and threats. Rigidity is an unnecessary constraint that challenges your resilience and ability to ensure security operations enable growth and innovation.

Without this flexibility, you could experience:

  • Inefficiency and wasted resources from vendor lock-in to services you no longer need or that don’t scale with your company’s growth.
  • Difficulty supporting new business initiatives with a rigid contract that renders your security posture as a bottleneck, rather than an enabler.
  • Increasing risk exposure as your business landscape changes without corresponding shifts to your managed security services.

The Hybrid Engagement Model 

Working in a shared services model with clearly defined responsibilities enables seamless collaboration with your internal team. Your MSSP’s security experts must be willing to transfer knowledge and help build the client's internal capabilities over time. A strong MSSP partner complements the existing team, rather than operating in a black box.

Without this model, you could experience:

  • Lack of transparency to what the MSSP is doing or how to verify their effectiveness.
  • Knowledge gaps that make your team dependent on the MSSP creating an operational risk should you ever end the partnership—not to mention internal team frustration.
  • Lackluster incident response due to confusion and unclear handoffs and responsibilities.

Vendor-Agnostic Technical and Operational Integration 

The ability to connect with and use a client's existing SIEM, ticketing system, and diverse technology stack. Establishing a new MSSP partnership shouldn't require investment in a whole new set of tools. Rather, it should strengthen the investments already made in your security tooling and systems, as well as upgrading processes, runbooks, and documentation.

Without this level of integration, you could experience:

  • Unnecessary capital expense for new tooling eliminates the value of your previous investments and creates significant implementation overhead.
  • Operational disruption diverts resources from core security operations and creates a more complex and fragmented security environment.
  • Slower time to value delays the realization of a return on your investment while also potentially leaving you vulnerable during the transition.

Tailored Service Offerings

The ability to offer specific, on-demand services like threat hunting or IT/OT expertise, depending on your unique risk appetite, critical assets, internal team capabilities, and security maturity.

Without services matched to your needs, you could experience:

  • Sub-optimal security posture due to a generic, one-size-fits-all service offering that may not address your unique risks.
  • Lack of strategic partnership because the relationship is transactional instead of a meaningful addition to your security operations.
  • Ineffective use of resources if the services don’t align with your internal capabilities means you may over-invest where you’re strong and under-invest where you need augmentation.

The Imperative of Control: Guiding Your Partnership

While flexibility is critical for a service to be effective, control is what ensures the partnership remains aligned with the CISO's strategic vision for cyber resilience. This isn’t about micromanaging, but about maintaining authority over key areas to protect the organization's assets and ensure business continuity.

CISOs who establish control in these critical areas create the right balance in their MSSP partnerships:

Control Over Service Scope and Responsibilities 

Ambiguity in roles can lead to dangerous gaps in vulnerability management and incident response. A well-defined Statement of Work (SOW) with explicit handoffs and communication flows is vital for seamless operations, team collaboration, and swift recovery.

Without a defined scope, you could experience:

  • Operational gaps due to confusion about responsibilities, allowing threats to escalate.
  • Lack of communication flows can turn a security event into a major breach.
  • Missing knowledge transfer from the MSSPs security experts to your internal team.

Control Over the Security Platform, Data, and IP 

The CISO must have full access to the platform and maintain ownership of all intellectual property, including custom rules and configurations. CISOs must also define data residency preferences and the log sources ingested and actively worked.

Without platform and data control, you could experience:

  • Vendor lock-in where ending the partnership requires a complete rebuild and results in a weaker security posture until rebuilt.
  • Loss of security knowledge and IP that served as the basis of your security operations.
  • Limited log source ingestion leaving areas of your attack surface unmonitored, introducing limited visibility to detect anomalies. 

Control Over Performance and Quality 

Without clear KPIs and SLAs, the CISO can't measure the MSSP's value. Robust metrics on true positives/false positives and Mean Time to Respond (MTTR) are essential for holding the partner accountable and driving continuous improvement. 

Without clear KPIs, you could experience:

  • Inability to get a clear gauge on your security posture and cyber resilience.
  • Lack of accountability that helps to align MSSP activities to your priorities. 
  • Stagnation that fails to advance your cyber resilience roadmap.

Control Over Response Actions 

While the MSSP should be capable of rapid containment, the CISO must retain the option for a "human-in-the-loop" for critical actions to prevent unintended consequences and ensure alignment with the organization's risk appetite.

Without defining response protocols, you could experience:

  • Disruption to critical business processes due to automated containment actions taken by the MSSP.
  • Lack of a balance between security and business continuity without CISO involvement to ensure actions match your organization’s risk tolerance.
  • A new set of problems by not calibrating the “aggressiveness” of MSSP actions. 

Achieving the Right Balance Pays Off in Stronger Cyber Resilience

The CISOs and security leaders we spoke with agreed that achieving cyber resilience is not a single event. It's a continuous journey. A customizable MSSP partnership—one built on the foundational principles of flexibility and control—is the most effective way to navigate this journey. A partnership built on transparency, trust, and mutual respect empowers your organization to adapt to evolving threats while maintaining strategic oversight of its security posture.

Demand a partner who is both flexible enough to meet your unique needs and transparent enough to give you the level of control you require. This is the best way to build a security program that is truly resilient. The alternative is a vendor who may just compromise the long-term effectiveness of your security program.